These resources are brought to you by the Cooperative Extension System and your Local Institution

Check out the news from the land grant university in your area.

Higher Retail Beef Prices Caused by Rising Production, Transportation Costs

Last Updated: March 21, 2008 Related resource areas: Beef Cattle


The annual average retail beef price for 2007 was $4.16 per pound, which was 5 percent higher than 2006 and exceeded the previous 2005 record of $4.09 per pound.

Released March 17, 2008

COLLEGE STATION, Texas – Rising feed and transportation costs continue to keep retail beef prices edging higher, a Texas AgriLife Extension Service economist said.

“One of the big stories this year as we start 2008 is we’re seeing higher prices for consumer beef, whether it’s at the grocery store or restaurants,” said David Anderson, AgriLife Extension Service livestock marketing economist.

The annual average retail beef price for 2007 was $4.16 per pound, which was 5 percent higher than 2006 and exceeded the previous 2005 record of $4.09 per pound, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service data. Factoring into the high beef prices is record-priced crude oil, which is increasing transportation costs for many beef suppliers, he said.

“There are higher costs of getting it to the store,” Anderson said. “When we talk about $100 per barrel oil, it ripples through the economy. Everything you get at a restaurant or grocery store, we have to get it from somewhere else.”

Another reason is a leveling of beef production across the U.S., Anderson said. With fewer cows and calves in national inventory, and increased export demand for U.S. beef, “that’s keeping pressure on beef prices,” he said.

At the producer level, calf prices have been forced lowest by rising feed costs which are tied to ethanol production. Lighter-weight calves are getting the most discounts because they require more feed to add weight before slaughter, Anderson said.

Anderson described the current calf market as a “tug of war.” USDA inventory indicates 1 percent fewer beef cows, which will lead to a smaller calf crop, he said.

“From a supply standpoint, that means fewer calves, and fewer calves usually means better prices for calves,” Anderson said. “I like to describe it as a tug of war going on in the calf market this year. You have feed on one side and high prices pressuring calf prices lower, then tight supply of calves on the other side pushing them higher.

“Still for 2008, we should see calf prices where they were in 2007, but a little bit lower due to the high feed costs. Given where we are in inventory, we should expect to see fewer cows in 2009, so tighter supplies keeping upward pressure on calf prices.”

Meanwhile, profit margins have also been tough for stocker producers. Recent USDA data indicated there were fewer calves on wheat pasture.

“That (report) confirmed what we all knew,” Anderson said. “That’s down 30 percent or basically one-third fewer calves. What that means for stocker producers is typically they see the lowest prices for 700-800 pound steers in March. They come off wheat then and go to feedlots.

“There were not a lot of calves on wheat pasture this year, so what is a seasonal low may hold up and we could see some moderation in the springtime that we usually don’t see. Consequently, we could see some heavier calf weight prices over the next couple of months simply because there’s not that much supply.”

-30-

http://agnews.tamu.edu/showstory.php?id=392

Contacts: David Anderson, (979) 845-4351, danderson@tamu.edu

Blair Fannin, (979) 845-2259,b-fannin@tamu.edu


Have a specific question? Try asking one of our Experts

Unlike most other resources on the web, we have experts from Universities around the country ready to answer your questions.

Comments

Post a comment about this topic

Please keep comments on topic. To ask a question, please use Ask an Expert. All comments are held for moderation. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be posted to the site.

Did you find this page useful?

No one has rated this article yet. Why not be the first?

what is this?
not useful
very useful
 1  2  3  4  5