Check out the news from the land grant university in your area.

Have a question? Try asking one of our Experts

Precision Fertilizer Rates May Help Sugarcane Farmers Save Money

Last Updated: July 21, 2008 | Related resource areas: Geospatial Technology
A LSU researcher has been studying how fertilizer rates affect yields by using sensor-based technology that can help farmers make fertilizer decisions based on what the crop needs in a particular location.

Released July 16, 2008

ST. GABRIEL, La. – Sugarcane growers can reduce the cost of producing their crops by following new fertilizer recommendations, researchers said today (July 16) at a sugarcane field day at the LSU AgCenter’s Sugar Research Station here.

Nitrogen fertilizer, which is made from natural gas, has increased significantly in price during the past year, said Brenda Tubana, a researcher in the LSU AgCenter School of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences.

Tubana has been studying how fertilizer rates affect yields by using sensor-based technology that can help farmers make fertilizer decisions based on what the crop needs in a particular location.

She has developed a calculator that growers can use to collect data and estimate the nitrogen requirements for a particular field to produce optimum yields.

“You can use this technology to maximize economic and agronomic returns,” she said.

Nitrogen fertilizer recommendations have been based on historical research dating back to the 1960s and 1970s, said Dr. Rich Johnson, a research agronomist with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service Sugarcane Research Laboratory in Houma.

Johnson said earlier recommendations were based on the use of anhydrous ammonia, the common nitrogen source 40 to 50 years ago. Because anhydrous ammonia is a gas that’s injected into the soil, some of the nitrogen is lost during application and some is lost in the soil.

The current fertilizer source of nitrogen is a liquid solution that is more stable in the soil.

The scientists are now recommending to sugarcane farmers that they can reduce the amount of nitrogen they apply to their crops because newer sugarcane varieties are more efficient in their use of the nutrient and because new sources of fertilizer are more efficient.

Johnson distributed new nitrogen fertilizer recommendations that represent decreases of approximately 15-20 percent in nitrogen rates across soil types and crop ages.

By using less, growers are able to reduce their fertilizer costs, which is particularly important as fertilizer prices are climbing as a result of rising energy prices, Johnson said.

The field day was the 26th annual event held at the LSU AgCenter’s Sugar Research Station, said Dr. David Boethel, AgCenter vice chancellor for research.

Since 2003, eight sugarcane varieties and two energy cane varieties have been released for Louisiana growers through a partnership of the LSU AgCenter, the USDA Sugar Research Unit in Houma and the American Sugar Cane League, located in Thibodaux, Boethel said.

The vice chancellor said that despite rising market prices for sugar, Louisiana growers are facing extremely high input costs for fertilizer and transportation.

“We’re trying to find ways to help farmers manage their crop,” Boethel said. “Variety development is the mainstay of the program.”

-30-

http://www.lsuagcenter.com/en/communications/news/headline_news/Precision+fertilizer+rates+may+help+sugarcane+farmers+save+money.htm

Contacts: Brenda Tubana, (225) 578-2110, btubana@agcenter.lsu.edu

Rick Bogren, (225) 578-5839, rbogren@agcenter.lsu.edu


Have a specific question? Try asking one of our Experts

Unlike most other resources on the web, we have experts from Universities around the country ready to answer your questions.

Comments

Post a comment about this topic

Please keep comments on topic. To ask a question, please use Ask an Expert. All comments are held for moderation. Comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be posted to the site.

Did you find this page useful?

No one has rated this article yet. Why not be the first? what is this?
not useful
very useful
 1  2  3  4  5